Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Texas

Fort Worth, TX

Fort Worth, TX · ~181 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Worth, TX runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Fort Worth, TX: 2.1 TCR = 47% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Worth, TX safety composite

Fort Worth, TX scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fort Worth, TX: 4.2 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 3.12× in 2024

Fort Worth, TX's TCR rose 2.8 from 4.2 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 47% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #121/297
  • PHOTO CHARLOTTE DRY
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 81 inj
  • SIZE ~181 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHARLOTTE DRY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Fort Worth, TX in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Worth, TX averages 2.1 TCR (47% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Worth, TX TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=7 · BLS 4.5

Where Fort Worth, TX falls in its industry

3,252 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #121 safest of 297 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in Texas.

Fort Worth, TX (181 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Worth, TX
Fort Worth, TX (181 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Fort Worth, TX has more employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 6.6 45 0 0
2023 5.7 4.4 32 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 0 1 0
2016 4.2 4.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · TX · Fort Worth

3,252 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHARLOTTE DRY 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Karl's Truck Repair 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6223-583 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6873 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cherry Crushed Concrete, Inc. 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Jobsites 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE AUSTIN TGS DIV OF 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Maintenance of Florida, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Outlet Shoppes of Atlanta 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New Bedford Plant 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carr Properties Services Subsidiary Corp 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valeo Smyrna Site 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plantation Products, LLC. 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyundai Translead - SD 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DAB8 181 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.