Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Texas

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton

Dayton, TX · ~160 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade A.

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton safety composite

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton held a steady TCR band

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.9 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Dayton, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/46
  • PHOTO CORTEC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CORTEC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 46 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Texas.

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton (160 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton
Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton (160 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Forum Energy Technologies - Dayton has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.1 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2018 1.8 0.0 4 0 0
2017 1.9 1.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · TX · Dayton

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 29 employers in Dayton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CORTEC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tulsa-Tube NTT 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Elbow 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vallourec Tube Alloy Richey 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE LRM San Antonio 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rio Grande Electric Cooperative, Inc. 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAM Industrial Solutions @ Citgo Corpus Christi 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Transport 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6698 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insteel Wire Products TXW 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store #43 91 FTE
NAT-TCR Forum Energy Technologies - Clearfield 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Clark Environmental Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Instrumentation : Washington SPO711 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wurth Snider Bolt & Screw, Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Off Lease Only LLC Orlando 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wenner Bakery -Bayport Facility 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Finley Asphalt & Concrete 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parks, Recreation and Tourism 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.