Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Texas

Foster Fence Ltd

Houston, TX · ~114 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Foster Fence Ltd runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade A.

Foster Fence Ltd: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Foster Fence Ltd safety composite

Foster Fence Ltd scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Foster Fence Ltd: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.63× in 2021

Foster Fence Ltd's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #84/206
  • PHOTO SCA Construction
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCA Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Foster Fence Ltd in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Foster Fence Ltd averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Foster Fence Ltd TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Foster Fence Ltd falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 206 Fence installation (except ele employers in Texas.

Foster Fence Ltd (114 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Foster Fence Ltd
Foster Fence Ltd (114 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Foster Fence Ltd has more employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · TX · Houston

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCA Construction 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ExxonMobil Baytown Refinery Baytown TX 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - Las Vegas - Branch 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Solutions, LLC - Lexington Branch 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lewis Resource Management - SA 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas Transmission 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sitterle Homes Ltd 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Texas Instruments SFAB1 Base Building #2128 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR HEADE 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Polystrand Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1100 Technology Park Drive 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Infogroup PapS9L 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avon Old Farms Hotel 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferro Corporation 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Linen Service--Healthcare Division 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE ELG Utica Alloys 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.