Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Fountaingrove Lodge

Santa Rosa, CA · ~97 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fountaingrove Lodge runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Fountaingrove Lodge: 4.3 TCR = 113% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fountaingrove Lodge safety composite

Fountaingrove Lodge scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fountaingrove Lodge: 0.0 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2024

Fountaingrove Lodge's TCR rose 5.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Santa Rosa, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 113% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #82/635
  • PHOTO Ohio Living - Mount …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ohio Living - Mount Pleasant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fountaingrove Lodge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fountaingrove Lodge averages 4.3 TCR (113% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fountaingrove Lodge TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Fountaingrove Lodge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Fountaingrove Lodge (97 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fountaingrove Lodge
Fountaingrove Lodge (97 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Fountaingrove Lodge has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 5.5 5 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2022 7.5 0.0 6 0 0
2021 5.3 5.3 4 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2019 7.6 6.3 6 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Santa Rosa

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 344 employers in Santa Rosa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ohio Living - Mount Pleasant 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor House of Mustang 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Discovery Villages at Naples AL 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Retirement and Community Arts Center 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grapeman Farms 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Varsity Packing, Inc 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westland Floral Company Carpinteria, Inc. 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOS ANGELES RESERVOIR 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 543 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121251 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001480 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA720 SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL HR 1,806 FTE
NAT-TCR Kamps Pallets Indianapolis California 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lebanon, TN - MK Plant 12 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AL_Birmingham_151 London Pkwy_00660101 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dream Logistics 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MPW Industrial Services, Inc. - Honda Indiana 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 88Delivers, LLC 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boise Route Works LLC 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE #23 Salmon Creek Chuck'S 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.