Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Four Seasons Vineyard Management

Geyserville, CA · ~54 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Four Seasons Vineyard Management runs at 344% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade F.

Four Seasons Vineyard Management: 15.5 TCR = 344% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Four Seasons Vineyard Management safety composite

Four Seasons Vineyard Management scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Four Seasons Vineyard Management: 10.8 → 15.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 26.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2024

Four Seasons Vineyard Management's TCR rose 4.9 from 10.8 in 2017 to 15.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 26.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Geyserville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.5 · 344% of ind

  • DART 15.7 DART
  • RANK #601/620
  • PHOTO Perform Labor Services
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perform Labor Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Four Seasons Vineyard Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Four Seasons Vineyard Management averages 15.5 TCR (344% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Four Seasons Vineyard Management TCR series: 2017=10.8 · 2018=26.6 · 2019=9.4 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=17 · 2023=14.1 · 2024=15.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Four Seasons Vineyard Management falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #601 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Four Seasons Vineyard Management (54 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Four Seasons Vineyard Management
Four Seasons Vineyard Management (54 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Four Seasons Vineyard Management has fewer employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.7 15.7 4 3 0
2023 14.1 14.1 6 1 0
2022 17.0 13.3 9 0 0
2021 15.3 11.0 5 2 0
2020 14.7 11.0 8 0 0
2019 9.4 5.7 4 1 0
2018 26.6 9.5 13 1 0
2017 10.8 6.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Geyserville

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 20 employers in Geyserville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Perform Labor Services 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR farm labor 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR JUANA C ESPINO 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EAGLE AG SERVICES, LLC 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sea Mist Farms 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harold E. Robben, Jr. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jose Maria Perez 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pauma Valley 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 398 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redwood Empire Vineyard Management 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Coast Vineyard Management Inc 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Francis Coppola Winery 208 FTE
NAT-TCR Steel Services, Inc. Roanoke 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Shady Lawn Nursing and Rehab 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trailer World 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-Township Fire Protection District 15.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Scaffold NW 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tribunal Supremo 37 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bgroup 3 Inc, dba FEN-TECH 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pods Otr Dpf 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.