Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Montana

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital

Glasgow, MT · ~263 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade C.

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital: 7.8 TCR = 104% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital safety composite

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−133.9

2022→2024

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital injury rate improved

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital's TCR fell 133.9 from 140.5 in 2022 to 6.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 140.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=140.5 · 2023=9.0 · 2024=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Glasgow, MT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 7.8 · 104% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #47/55
  • PHOTO UChicago Medicine Ad…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UChicago Medicine AdventHealth GlenOaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital averages 7.8 TCR (104% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital TCR series: 2022=140.5 · 2023=9 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 7.5

Where Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 55 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Montana.

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital (263 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital
Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital (263 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 1.9 13 1 0
2023 9.0 0.9 18 1 0
2022 140.5 55.0 18 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MT · Glasgow

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 12 employers in Glasgow, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UChicago Medicine AdventHealth GlenOaks 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MH Mission Hospital McDowell, LLLP 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nason Medical Center, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1855-TNNAS24 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Home Care Services 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocky Mountain Contractors, Main Office 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0096 - BOZEMAN MT WHSE 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE RCHC MT - MISSOULA STATE FUNDED 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley View Nursing Home 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Market-Glasgow 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4054-ABS-0030-0030-04012 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4054-000004012 44 FTE
NAT-TCR Cygnet Automated Cleaning LLC. 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR N.H. Scheppers Distributing - Jefferson City 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rapid City (1016) 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Retreats at Wild Acres 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE AI Distribution Center 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1524 - Las Vegas Summerlin South 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE STERIS St. Louis 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Camas 263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.