Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls

Little Falls, MN · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls: 7.2 TCR = 190% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls safety composite

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2020→2022

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls injury rate improved

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls's TCR fell 1.4 from 7.9 in 2020 to 6.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.9 · 2022=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Little Falls, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 190% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #109/226
  • PHOTO The Waterford at Tho…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Waterford at Thousand Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls averages 7.2 TCR (190% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls TCR series: 2020=7.9 · 2022=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls (38 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls
Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls (38 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.5 6.5 0 1 0
2020 7.9 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Little Falls

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Little Falls, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Thousand Oaks 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Richmond Heights 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeshore Manor 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newberg Memory Associates, LLC 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pine Tree Orchard 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE LB Pork Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foley Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2528-Glyndon, MN (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR IWCO Direct Little Falls 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Little Falls Public School District 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1634 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1634 358 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00148 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-03069 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0023-02672 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Colorado Rehabilitation Hospital Inc 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE VNA Clinton 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raleigh NC Yard 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Opportunity Sheltered Industries, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.