Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Missouri

Frank Fischer Design Aire

Maryland Heights, MO · ~82 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Frank Fischer Design Aire runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Frank Fischer Design Aire: 2.4 TCR = 86% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Frank Fischer Design Aire safety composite

Frank Fischer Design Aire scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2024

Frank Fischer Design Aire injury rate improved

Frank Fischer Design Aire's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.9 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=4.3 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Maryland Heights, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 86% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #36/90
  • PHOTO Monroe piping & shee…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monroe piping & sheet Metal llc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Frank Fischer Design Aire in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Frank Fischer Design Aire averages 2.4 TCR (86% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Frank Fischer Design Aire TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=4.3 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Frank Fischer Design Aire falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 90 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Missouri.

Frank Fischer Design Aire (82 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Frank Fischer Design Aire
Frank Fischer Design Aire (82 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Frank Fischer Design Aire has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.3 2 0 0
2023 2.7 1.4 2 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 3 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MO · Maryland Heights

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Monroe piping & sheet Metal llc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Energy Air, Inc. Plant City 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carrier Commercial Services (Nashville) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCM FIRE PROTECTION 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Lake Road Generating Facility 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bordner Home Improvement 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Storee Construction Co 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE K & E Flatwork LLC 82 FTE
NAT-TCR Showroom/ CM & SS Fabrication/ Install 10848 Wheatlands Ave Santee 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alcal Fresno Multi-Product 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockwood Specialties LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Keefe Group Denver 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coventry High School 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ringland-Johnson, Inc 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maddox Farms (Burrel Location) 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reliance Upholstery Supply Compnay Inc. 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.