Electrical contractors · New York

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc

Woodside, NY · ~217 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc runs at 295% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc: 8.3 TCR = 295% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc safety composite

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2017→2024

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc injury rate improved

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc's TCR fell 3.9 from 7.8 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.8 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=12.0 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Woodside, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 295% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #233/252
  • PHOTO 1-ACI-Detroit
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 111 inj
  • SIZE ~217 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1-ACI-Detroit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fred Geller Electrical, Inc averages 8.3 TCR (295% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc TCR series: 2017=7.8 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=12 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=4 · BLS 2.8

Where Fred Geller Electrical, Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #233 safest of 252 Electrical contractors employers in New York.

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc (217 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fred Geller Electrical, Inc
Fred Geller Electrical, Inc (217 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Fred Geller Electrical, Inc has more employees than the Electrical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 7 0 0
2023 6.7 5.2 9 0 0
2022 5.3 5.3 7 0 0
2021 10.2 9.1 20 0 0
2020 12.0 10.0 18 0 0
2019 6.3 4.8 12 0 0
2018 13.8 11.0 27 2 0
2017 7.8 6.4 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NY · Woodside

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 34 employers in Woodside, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1-ACI-Detroit 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Electrical Systems 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delaney Telecom, Inc. - Facebook DKL 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 500 Brush Ave 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE RG&E 3 City Center 217 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forefront Contracting Inc. 217 FTE
STATE-SIZE KANPAK Manufacturing Penn Yan 217 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trader Joe's 0539 New York 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bench NYC 703 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Asbestos Removal Inc. 559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitestone Construction Corp. 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Queens Boulevard Extended Care Facility 505 FTE
NAT-TCR BNACB - Courtyard by Marriott Murfreesboro 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Waterman 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadway 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Clermont Steel Fabricators 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE BN Facility 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carl Buddig & Company-15600 Wentowrth 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Pultrusions 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Dallas 1 217 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.