Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Virginia

Freedom Analytics, Inc

Chantilly, VA · ~45 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Freedom Analytics, Inc runs at 354% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

Freedom Analytics, Inc: 15.9 TCR = 354% of Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Freedom Analytics, Inc safety composite

Freedom Analytics, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Freedom Analytics, Inc: 13.1 → 18.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 18.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2023

Freedom Analytics, Inc's TCR rose 5.8 from 13.1 in 2022 to 18.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Chantilly, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.9 · 354% of ind

  • DART 18.8 DART
  • RANK #25/33
  • PHOTO 6458-ZSYL
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6458-ZSYL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Freedom Analytics, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Freedom Analytics, Inc averages 15.9 TCR (354% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Freedom Analytics, Inc TCR series: 2022=13.1 · 2023=18.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Freedom Analytics, Inc falls in its industry

1,452 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 33 Local letter and parcel delive employers in Virginia.

Freedom Analytics, Inc (45 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Freedom Analytics, Inc
Freedom Analytics, Inc (45 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Freedom Analytics, Inc has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 18.8 18.8 6 0 0
2022 13.1 13.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · VA · Chantilly

1,452 Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 140 employers in Chantilly, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZSYL 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZMAC 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZLRD 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZMPG 15.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE VA09S-SEL-VIRGINIA SERVICE ROOM 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREENSVILLE COUNTY POWER STATION 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Harrisonburg Public Utilities 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmville Public Works 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dulles (Chantilly) 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCD 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMERICAN SYSTEMS 1,404 FTE
CITY-NEAR VADUL - DULLES 996 FTE
NAT-TCR Casey Health Care 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02107 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of Denver Castle Rock 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rule Steel Plant 1 15.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florida Recovery Center 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Irving 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moover Rockingham 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roth Southeast 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.