Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · California

Fresenius USA Inc.

Concord, CA · ~515 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fresenius USA Inc. runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Fresenius USA Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fresenius USA Inc. safety composite

Fresenius USA Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fresenius USA Inc.: 1.4 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2023

Fresenius USA Inc.'s TCR rose 1.3 from 1.4 in 2019 to 2.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Concord, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #39/79
  • PHOTO MTI Main Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~515 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MTI Main Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fresenius USA Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fresenius USA Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fresenius USA Inc. TCR series: 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=3.3 · 2023=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Fresenius USA Inc. falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 79 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in California.

Fresenius USA Inc. (515 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fresenius USA Inc.
Fresenius USA Inc. (515 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Fresenius USA Inc. has more employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.7 2.7 13 0 0
2021 3.3 2.8 3 17 0
2020 0.9 0.8 7 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · CA · Concord

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 201 employers in Concord, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MTI Main Plant 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unither Manufacturing LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPT - East Josephine Street 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CN Pleasanton 515 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sacramento Retail Support Center - Ace Hardware 515 FTE
STATE-SIZE GK Management Co., Inc. 515 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenn County Personnel 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-01 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 403 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR AX9 Security Inc 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gonsalves and Santucci 1,551 FTE
NAT-TCR Dept. of Military & Veterans Affairs (8) 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Arlington Courthouse Plaza 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Golub Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethlehem #159 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bh Drywall & Stucco Co. Inc 515 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Regional Center 515 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanesbrands, Inc. Cleveland Distribution Center 515 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waupaca Foundry, Inc. Plant 6 515 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.