Industrial building (except warehouses) construction · Illinois

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc.

Murphysboro, IL · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 104% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. safety composite

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc.: 0.0 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2017

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc.'s TCR rose 6.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Murphysboro, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 104% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #24/33
  • PHOTO Quality Construction…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Construction by McLeRoy, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (104% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6 · BLS 2.9

Where Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 33 Industrial building (except wa employers in Illinois.

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. (36 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fricke Management & Contracting Inc.
Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. (36 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. has fewer employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · IL · Murphysboro

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 24 employers in Murphysboro, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Construction by McLeRoy, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teva Pharmaceuticals 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CR Meyer - Byron 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metalsa 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Illinois Foundation Seed Inc- Harvard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHI Greenhouse LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE MT ERIE COMPLEX -EST 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Malta 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson County Government 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Aluminum International LLC - Murphysboro, Il 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 302 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Memorial Hospital 246 FTE
NAT-TCR Russell Construction Company.Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 06 Lakeville Warehouse 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 09 - Johnson City 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph Center (Mijos) 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE C.L. Smith Industrial Company 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pannell Industries, Inc. Dallas-Fort Worth District 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0055 - El Paso, Tx 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cavalieri Construction Company Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.