Continuing care retirement communities · Indiana

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc.

Richmond, IN · ~183 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc.: 7.1 TCR = 186% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. safety composite

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. injury rate improved

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.4 from 7.7 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=8.5 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Richmond, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #77/136
  • PHOTO Vineyard Place
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vineyard Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. averages 7.1 TCR (186% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=8.5 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 136 Continuing care retirement com employers in Indiana.

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. (183 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Friends Fellowship Community, Inc.
Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. (183 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Friends Fellowship Community, Inc. has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 4.7 6 2 0
2023 8.3 4.2 10 0 0
2022 6.6 5.0 8 0 0
2021 4.9 2.5 6 0 0
2020 7.6 3.4 11 0 0
2019 9.6 4.1 14 0 0
2018 8.5 7.2 13 0 0
2017 4.1 2.7 6 0 0
2016 7.7 7.0 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Richmond

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 131 employers in Richmond, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vineyard Place 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chisholm Place 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Lely Palms 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Osceola ALF Operator LLC 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amcor Rigid Packaging USA, LLC - Franklin 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brake Supply Evansville 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE New York Blower Company / LaPorte 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Talbert Manufacturing, Inc. 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR City Of Richmond 535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Belden, Inc. 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1745 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1745 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Owens & Minor Albuquerque 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Tires of America, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LNO 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SFO Dairy Lane 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Addison 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE XMI 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Rehab Hospital of Arlington 6789 - 4086 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Rapids Facility 183 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.