Continuing care retirement communities · Ohio

Friendship Village Columbus

Columbus, OH · ~304 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Friendship Village Columbus runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Friendship Village Columbus: 8.4 TCR = 221% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Friendship Village Columbus safety composite

Friendship Village Columbus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Friendship Village Columbus: 4.0 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 18.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2023

Friendship Village Columbus's TCR rose 2.6 from 4.0 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #170/234
  • PHOTO Highview Hills
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~304 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Highview Hills (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Friendship Village Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Friendship Village Columbus averages 8.4 TCR (221% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Friendship Village Columbus TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=18.5 · 2022=16.6 · 2023=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Friendship Village Columbus falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #170 safest of 234 Continuing care retirement com employers in Ohio.

Friendship Village Columbus (304 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Friendship Village Columbus
Friendship Village Columbus (304 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Friendship Village Columbus has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.5 4.7 6 5 0
2022 16.6 16.6 7 22 0
2020 18.5 18.0 4 31 0
2019 5.4 3.2 10 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 4 0 0
2017 5.7 4.5 10 0 0
2016 4.0 2.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Columbus

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Highview Hills 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts - Sarasota 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vi at Lakeside Village 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Lisle 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dean - Toledo (Suiza) 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Bernard Soap 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE 230 Industrial Drive 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3282 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR North America : Klamath Falls 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt. Sterling, KY Hauling Operations 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Yancey's Fancy/Brickhouse Road Factory 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bane Bay Path LLC 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guthrie Theater 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles Aero 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE Appleton Office 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE Motion Systems : Richland 304 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.