Retirement homes with nursing care · Pennsylvania

Friendship Village of South Hills

Pittsburgh, PA · ~239 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Friendship Village of South Hills runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement homes with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Friendship Village of South Hills: 22.9 TCR = 353% of Retirement homes with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Friendship Village of South Hills safety composite

Friendship Village of South Hills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−29.0

2018→2019

Friendship Village of South Hills injury rate improved

Friendship Village of South Hills's TCR fell 29.0 from 37.4 in 2018 to 8.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 37.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=37.4 · 2019=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 22.9 · 353% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #730/754
  • PHOTO Avamere Rehabilitati…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~239 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avamere Rehabilitation of Coos Bay (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Friendship Village of South Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Friendship Village of South Hills averages 22.9 TCR (353% of the Retirement homes with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Friendship Village of South Hills TCR series: 2018=37.4 · 2019=8.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Friendship Village of South Hills falls in its industry

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #730 safest of 754 Retirement homes with nursing employers in Pennsylvania.

Friendship Village of South Hills (239 employees, TCR 22.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Friendship Village of South Hills
Friendship Village of South Hills (239 employees, TCR 22.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Friendship Village of South Hills has more employees than the Retirement homes with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.4 4.2 16 0 0
2018 37.4 21.4 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Pittsburgh

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avamere Rehabilitation of Coos Bay 22.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LECOM Nursing and Rehabilitation 22.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adult NJ Day and Adult Employment 22.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Putnam City Convalescent Center, LLC dba The Grand at Bethany Skilled Nursing and Therapy 22.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE IT Landes 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE Troegs Brewing Company 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE NVR Building Products (PGH) 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE The AZEK Company - KEYSER AVE 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Valleywide Logistics, Inc 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rush Medical Clinic Philadelphia 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mawlg - Wilmington 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR JC Logistics 22.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE L3 Technologies, Inc. SSG 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE OBH 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electro Scientific Industries Inc - Portland, OR 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meridian Nursing and Rehab - Shrewsbury 239 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.