Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Missouri

Frontline Logistics, LLC

Ashland, MO · ~94 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Frontline Logistics, LLC runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Frontline Logistics, LLC: 14.6 TCR = 225% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Frontline Logistics, LLC safety composite

Frontline Logistics, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
C 4.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2022→2024

Frontline Logistics, LLC injury rate improved

Frontline Logistics, LLC's TCR fell 10.5 from 15.5 in 2022 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 23.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=15.5 · 2023=23.5 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Ashland, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 225% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #112/132
  • PHOTO MAWLG - NORTH READING
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MAWLG - NORTH READING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Frontline Logistics, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Frontline Logistics, LLC averages 14.6 TCR (225% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Frontline Logistics, LLC TCR series: 2022=15.5 · 2023=23.5 · 2024=5 · BLS 6.5

Where Frontline Logistics, LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 132 Express delivery services (exc employers in Missouri.

Frontline Logistics, LLC (94 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Frontline Logistics, LLC
Frontline Logistics, LLC (94 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Frontline Logistics, LLC has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 4 0 0
2023 23.5 16.1 19 0 0
2022 15.5 15.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MO · Ashland

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 6 employers in Ashland, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MAWLG - NORTH READING 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 304520000 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PETALUMA (CAPET) 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 482420001 14.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Northeast Missouri 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ozark Border Electric Cooperative 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTS Contracting Inc. 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Springfield Interior 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - WMO3 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR IP Focus Logistics and Services LLC 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashland Nursing and Rehab LLC 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moser's Foods #5 31 FTE
NAT-TCR Gaffney Elementary School 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacesetter - Chicago 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Agway of Cape Cod - Orleans 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Yard 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office (9900) 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of White Plains- Parking Department 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Tree Pharmacy 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Centerville 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.