Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Arkansas

FSM

Fort Smith, AR · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FSM runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

FSM: 3.1 TCR = 48% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FSM safety composite

FSM scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

FSM held a steady TCR band

FSM's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Fort Smith, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 3.1 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/70
  • PHOTO 410180000
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 410180000 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

FSM in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FSM averages 3.1 TCR (48% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FSM TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.2 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where FSM falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 70 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Arkansas.

FSM (41 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate FSM
FSM (41 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

FSM has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2022 6.7 3.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.3 11.3 3 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 5.2 4.3 6 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AR · Fort Smith

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 410180000 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MARSHALLTOWN (IAMAR) 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MARTINEZ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DYN9 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE GRAVES GIN CORP 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE McGehee Producers Gin 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy El Dorado 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirby Specialties Corporation 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith 970 FTE
NAT-TCR Dunkirk Specialty Steel 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SalonCentric Inc. - McCalla Distribution 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lemoyne Karns Food Store 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hughesparker Ind. LLC Plant #1 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Power Building Products 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suwanee Office #1002 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartford Water Pollution Control Facility 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodstock 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.