In-vivo diagnostic substances manufacturing · Wisconsin

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI

Madison, WI · ~151 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical In-vivo diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI: 2.0 TCR = 62% of In-vivo diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI safety composite

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Madison, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/22
  • PHOTO Reckitt
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reckitt (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the In-vivo diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI falls in its industry

855 In-vivo diagnostic substances establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 22 In-vivo diagnostic substances employers in Wisconsin.

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI (151 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI
FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI (151 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI has fewer employees than the In-vivo diagnostic substances manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.0 3 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 3 0 0
2021 6.5 0.7 9 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 0.7 6 0 0
2018 2.1 0.7 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · WI · Madison

855 In-vivo diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reckitt 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LSNE-Madison, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catalent Greenville NC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alcami Corporation - Charleston 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barron Grow Out 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Uihlein Electric 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry-Manitowoc 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Bay, WI Facility 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR Florida Food Products, LLC - Amelia Bay 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX - Coors (6657) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mary Anna Nursing Home 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Unified Abatement Services, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE C&A Industries, LLC 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nilit America, Inc. 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lasting Hope Recovery Center 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE IND Indianapolis International Airport 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.