Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Full Circle Farming LLC

Porterville, CA · ~124 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Full Circle Farming LLC runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade D.

Full Circle Farming LLC: 6.1 TCR = 135% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Full Circle Farming LLC safety composite

Full Circle Farming LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2017→2024

Full Circle Farming LLC injury rate improved

Full Circle Farming LLC's TCR fell 4.7 from 6.3 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 14.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.3 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Porterville, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 135% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #415/620
  • PHOTO PGM PACKING, INC.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PGM PACKING, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Full Circle Farming LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Full Circle Farming LLC averages 6.1 TCR (135% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Full Circle Farming LLC TCR series: 2017=6.3 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Full Circle Farming LLC falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #415 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Full Circle Farming LLC (124 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Full Circle Farming LLC
Full Circle Farming LLC (124 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Full Circle Farming LLC has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2022 7.2 3.6 4 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 1 1 0
2020 14.6 14.6 3 6 0
2019 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2018 6.5 6.5 4 0 0
2017 6.3 3.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Porterville

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 147 employers in Porterville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PGM PACKING, INC. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JVKS Harvest Solutions, LLC dba: AgSocio 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DE LA TORRE HARVESTING, INC. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coastal Ag Labor Resources Inc. 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rancho Guadalupe 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Smith Company 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Four Star Management LLC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE California 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 173 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR AG 1,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Star Harvesting Inc 1 1,180 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6021 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Blue Ridge Mountain Electric Membership 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ACS Industries Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sea Fox Boats 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AAA Concrete 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE P&L Developments, LLC 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCC Community Markets - Central District 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCC Community Markets - Bothell 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE 413009-Pine Brook | NJ | NJL-800 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.