Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · Tennessee

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc.

Chattanooga, TN · ~95 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 76% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. safety composite

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2018→2024

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 4.4 from 5.6 in 2018 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #12/34
  • PHOTO Christman Constructo…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Christman Constructors, Inc - Michigan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (76% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. TCR series: 2018=5.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 34 Foundation, building, poured c employers in Tennessee.

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. (95 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc.
Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. (95 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Fulmer Concrete Finishing Co., Inc. has more employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2018 5.6 2.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · TN · Chattanooga

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Christman Constructors, Inc - Michigan 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glasrock/OMI Detroit 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MONCON INC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR potter concrete ltd 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GP Vaccination (Loretto) 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gallatin Dewater and Flow Management Project 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Memphis, TN HVAC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE F. L. Crane & Sons, Inc. Memphis 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Ocean Spray Cranberries 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Homes San Antonio, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mount Pleasant Assisted Living 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Tallgrass 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cork Supply USA, Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sealed Air Corporation 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minot Health and Rehab 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5709 Bonded Logistics 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.