Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) · Georgia

Further Processing Plant

Gainesville, GA · ~774 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Further Processing Plant runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) workplace, earning a grade C.

Further Processing Plant: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Further Processing Plant safety composite

Further Processing Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2018

Further Processing Plant injury rate improved

Further Processing Plant's TCR fell 1.7 from 3.8 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Gainesville, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #39/67
  • PHOTO Peco Foods Inc Feath…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~774 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peco Foods Inc Feather Lane (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Further Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Further Processing Plant averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Further Processing Plant TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Further Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, f establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 67 Chickens, processing, fresh, f employers in Georgia.

Further Processing Plant (774 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Further Processing Plant
Further Processing Plant (774 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Further Processing Plant has more employees than the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, can median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.1 2.0 13 5 0
2017 3.2 3.1 15 11 0
2016 3.8 3.2 22 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · GA · Gainesville

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 306 employers in Gainesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peco Foods Inc Feather Lane 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primary Poultry - Springdale AR Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butterball LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dothan Plant 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE GAFPA - FOREST PARK 774 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - AGS5 775 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta 776 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mannington Commercial 778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation 1,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poultry Processing 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant 1,190 FTE
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #607 (Seymour, WI) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 01 - Elizabeth Terminal 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CH6 New Limeco,LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burns Industrial Equipment 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Madison Heights (Mimad) 774 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - INEOS Chocolate Bayou 774 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alterman, Inc. 774 FTE
NAT-SIZE Friedman Brothers Hardware INC 774 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.