Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Texas

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant

Richmond, TX · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade F.

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant: 2.5 TCR = 210% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant safety composite

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant: 0.0 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant's TCR rose 5.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 5.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Richmond, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 210% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #68/86
  • PHOTO 00722 WYODAK PLANT
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00722 WYODAK PLANT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant averages 2.5 TCR (210% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant TCR series: 2018=0 · 2021=5 · BLS 1.2

Where Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 86 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Texas.

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant (20 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant
Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant (20 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Fusco Energy Center (Brazos Valley Power Plant has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Richmond

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 72 employers in Richmond, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00722 WYODAK PLANT 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fossil Generation Gorgas Steam Plant 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KCP&L - Lake Road Generating Facility 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hays 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms TXP 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CANNONADE SOD FARM 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Cooperative Society #1 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Slaton Coop Gin 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU6 2,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR OakBend Medical Center 1,038 FTE
CITY-NEAR OAkbend Medical Center-Jackson Street Hospital Campus 814 FTE
CITY-NEAR OakBend Medical Center- Williams Way Hospital Campus 676 FTE
NAT-TCR Drury Plaza Hotel - Pittsburgh Downtown 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Early Learning Center 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR High Country Line 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR orangevale 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE PCS San Jose 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE VB Seals 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2018129 - Marriott Bethesda HQ 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE AmeriGas - Garner, NC 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.