Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Indiana

Futaba Indiana of America

Vincennes, IN · ~698 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Futaba Indiana of America runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Futaba Indiana of America: 5.3 TCR = 98% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Futaba Indiana of America safety composite

Futaba Indiana of America scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.9

2016→2024

Futaba Indiana of America injury rate improved

Futaba Indiana of America's TCR fell 11.9 from 13.0 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.0 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Vincennes, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #21/31
  • PHOTO Acemco Incorporated …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 395 inj
  • SIZE ~698 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Acemco Incorporated - Stamping (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Futaba Indiana of America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Futaba Indiana of America averages 5.3 TCR (98% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Futaba Indiana of America TCR series: 2016=13 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Futaba Indiana of America falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 31 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Indiana.

Futaba Indiana of America (698 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Futaba Indiana of America
Futaba Indiana of America (698 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Futaba Indiana of America has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.9 13 0 0
2023 3.4 2.8 38 0 0
2022 4.5 1.9 19 11 0
2021 4.3 2.0 22 10 0
2020 3.8 1.8 24 1 0
2019 3.3 1.4 26 0 0
2018 6.8 2.6 59 0 0
2017 7.4 4.0 66 2 0
2016 13.0 5.3 128 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · IN · Vincennes

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 74 employers in Vincennes, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Acemco Incorporated - Stamping 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lear Corporation - Morristown 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wrena LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flex N Gate Shelby Twp. 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Evansville Bakery 698 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heartland Food Products Group Plant 698 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Equipment Corporation 698 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terre Haute Regional Hospital 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR Farbest Foods Vincennes 445 FTE
CITY-NEAR Farbest Foods, Inc. 435 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital Physician Services 327 FTE
NAT-TCR Dimensions Living Appleton LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aspire Bakeries - Newark 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Thierica Automation & Equipment Corporation 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Medart 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ArborWorks, LLC 698 FTE
NAT-SIZE CO Hanley 698 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Carwash Solutions 698 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colmar, PA 698 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.