Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Maryland

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation

Pasadena, MD · ~233 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation: 0.8 TCR = 22% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation safety composite

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation held a steady TCR band

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.9 in 2023 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.9 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Pasadena, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/87
  • PHOTO Sheboygan County
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sheboygan County (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FutureCare Health and Management Corporation averages 0.8 TCR (22% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation TCR series: 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.8

Where FutureCare Health and Management Corporation falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 87 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation (233 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate FutureCare Health and Management Corporation
FutureCare Health and Management Corporation (233 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

FutureCare Health and Management Corporation has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MD · Pasadena

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 32 employers in Pasadena, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sheboygan County 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Immanuel Courtyard 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FITCHBURG ASSISTED LIVING 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00414 - Harmony Trace 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shop Rite of White Oak 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZSBA 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA-DMD-FREDERICK MD 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canam Steel Corporation, Point of Rocks 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5382 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5382 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospice of the Chesapeake 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR FutureCare Rehabilitation Services 265 FTE
NAT-TCR EasTex Tower 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0262 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana Wesleyan University 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio Valley Trafford 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ralph Lauren Corporation - Beechwood Distribution Center 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medfleet LLC 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of North Tampa 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port Charlotte Rehabilitation Center 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.