Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing · Indiana

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant

Marshall, IN · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant: 8.1 TCR = 245% of Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant safety composite

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2021

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant injury rate improved

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant's TCR fell 1.0 from 11.1 in 2016 to 10.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.1 · 2017=9.4 · 2018=11.1 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=10.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Marshall, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 245% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/25
  • PHOTO SWM - Greenfield, MA
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SWM - Greenfield, MA (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant averages 8.1 TCR (245% of the Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2017=9.4 · 2018=11.1 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=10.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant falls in its industry

303 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated ( establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 25 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated ( employers in Indiana.

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant (30 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant
Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant (30 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Futurex Industries - Marshall Plant has fewer employees than the Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except pac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.1 0.0 3 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2018 11.1 11.1 3 0 0
2017 9.4 3.1 3 0 0
2016 11.1 7.4 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · IN · Marshall

303 Sheet, plastics, unlaminated (except packaging), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SWM - Greenfield, MA 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flex - O - Glass 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nan Ya Plastics Wharton 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Films Sioux Falls 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Noblesville Generating Station 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawrenceburg Power, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE HQ 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steuben County REMC 30 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Putty Products Company 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Main 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wade Heating and Cooling, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Centrum Valley Farms West 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gardner-Fields, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross's Village Shop n Save 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE T.T. Barge Cleaning Mile 183, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Alabama Construction 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.