Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass · South Carolina

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina

Fountain Inn, SC · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade A.

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina: 1.5 TCR = 44% of Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina safety composite

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2023

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2022 to 2.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Fountain Inn, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 44% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Cardinal CT -Adel CT
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cardinal CT -Adel CT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina averages 1.5 TCR (44% of the Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina falls in its industry

441 Glass products (except packagi establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Glass products (except packagi employers in South Carolina.

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina (24 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina
Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina (24 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Fuyao Glass America, South Carolina has fewer employees than the Glass products (except packaging contain median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · SC · Fountain Inn

441 Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Fountain Inn, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cardinal CT -Adel CT 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAC Thin Films Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accu-Glass 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR VA Glass LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE Newberry Silverstreet Processing 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Timberlands 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aiken Substation/Transmission 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meter Lab (Columbia) 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bosch Rexroth FniP 957 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC/FniP Fountain Inn 900 FTE
CITY-NEAR AVX Corporation 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fountain Inn 655 FTE
NAT-TCR J. Willis Smith and Brother Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Reading D.C 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #520 (United) 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crs Tco 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5523 - Action Pest - Evansville 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE DK and S Enterprises Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCoys Building Supply- Baytown 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zarsky Lumber Co - Victoria 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.