Fabricated plate work manufacturing · Illinois

G E Mathis Company

Chicago, IL · ~83 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G E Mathis Company runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fabricated plate work manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

G E Mathis Company: 4.0 TCR = 123% of Fabricated plate work manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G E Mathis Company safety composite

G E Mathis Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

G E Mathis Company injury rate improved

G E Mathis Company's TCR fell 3.4 from 5.5 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 123% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #8/21
  • PHOTO Unified Defense LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Unified Defense LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

G E Mathis Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G E Mathis Company averages 4.0 TCR (123% of the Fabricated plate work manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G E Mathis Company TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where G E Mathis Company falls in its industry

449 Fabricated plate work manufact establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 21 Fabricated plate work manufact employers in Illinois.

G E Mathis Company (83 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate G E Mathis Company
G E Mathis Company (83 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

G E Mathis Company has more employees than the Fabricated plate work manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.5 2.3 4 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2019 4.9 4.9 5 0 0
2018 7.6 3.8 7 1 0
2017 8.6 6.4 8 0 0
2016 5.5 1.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · IL · Chicago

449 Fabricated plate work manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Unified Defense LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversified Metal Products, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Servi-Sure LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norris Cylinder Company- Longview 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jo-Carroll Energy - Elizabeth 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE 86 - Walsh Federal, LLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herlihy Mid-Continent Co. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark Roofing Co. 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Claremore Public Schools 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Delta Sky Club Atl Janitorial 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Pittsburgh/UPMC, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE NUEVA CASA ALCALDIA EDIFICIO WILLIAM MIRANDA MARIN 1110 200 a 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocean Peace 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE GREENSBURG 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brand Hydraulics Co. 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.