Excavation contractors · Massachusetts

G. M. White Construction, Inc.

Acushnet, MA · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G. M. White Construction, Inc. runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Excavation contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

G. M. White Construction, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 88% of Excavation contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G. M. White Construction, Inc. safety composite

G. M. White Construction, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

G. M. White Construction, Inc. held a steady TCR band

G. M. White Construction, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Acushnet, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/56
  • PHOTO JR Industrial, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JR Industrial, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

G. M. White Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G. M. White Construction, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (88% of the Excavation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G. M. White Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3 · 2018=6 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where G. M. White Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Excavation contractors establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 56 Excavation contractors employers in Massachusetts.

G. M. White Construction, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate G. M. White Construction, Inc.
G. M. White Construction, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

G. M. White Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Excavation contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 9.5 3.2 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · MA · Acushnet

1,750 Excavation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 5 employers in Acushnet, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JR Industrial, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plains Utilities & Excavating 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milherst Construction, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Range Construction Inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green City Growers 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Good Chemistry - Holliston 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Boston 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTH ADAMS-MA27 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acushnet 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR PJ Keating Acushnet 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR D. W. White Construction, Inc. 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Araujo Bros Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 122 FTE
NAT-TCR Morris Masonry Restoration LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ADESA San Diego 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1271 Bat34 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 189 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE YES Management Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Soil Environmental, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE A&W Iron & Metal Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose Retirement Community of Stillwater 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.