Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local · Massachusetts

G. Mello Disposal

Georgetown, MA · ~19 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G. Mello Disposal runs at 376% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local workplace, earning a grade F.

G. Mello Disposal: 9.8 TCR = 376% of Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G. Mello Disposal safety composite

G. Mello Disposal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−39.1

2017→2024

G. Mello Disposal injury rate improved

G. Mello Disposal's TCR fell 39.1 from 39.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 39.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=39.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Georgetown, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 376% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/36
  • PHOTO Recology Western Ore…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Recology Western Oregon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

G. Mello Disposal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G. Mello Disposal averages 9.8 TCR (376% of the Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G. Mello Disposal TCR series: 2017=39.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where G. Mello Disposal falls in its industry

2,322 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous so establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 36 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous so employers in Massachusetts.

G. Mello Disposal (19 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate G. Mello Disposal
G. Mello Disposal (19 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

G. Mello Disposal has fewer employees than the Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 39.1 35.4 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MA · Georgetown

2,322 Rubbish (i.e., nonhazardous solid waste) hauling, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 12 employers in Georgetown, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Recology Western Oregon 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Indiana Operations 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Department of Streets & Sanitation - Bureau of Sanitation District Sanitation Office - D7 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solid Waste and Recycling 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE ALL ENERGY SOLAR North East 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE 911-NiSource-Ludlow MA 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Douglas A King Builders, Inc 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saloomey Construction Inc 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mirra Co LLC 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metal Tronics, LLC 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cambridgeport 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR UFPT Georgetown 59 FTE
NAT-TCR Fashion Square 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Portland North Harbor 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Blackburns Chimney Services 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NEA 9.8 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.