Laundry machinery and equipment (except household-type) manufacturing · New York

G.A. Braun, Inc

North Syracuse, NY · ~190 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G.A. Braun, Inc runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Laundry machinery and equipment (except household-type) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

G.A. Braun, Inc: 4.5 TCR = 136% of Laundry machinery and equipment (except household-type) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G.A. Braun, Inc safety composite

G.A. Braun, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

G.A. Braun, Inc held a steady TCR band

G.A. Braun, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 3.1 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=5.9 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=12.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333318 · North Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 136% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Veolia WTS Services …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Veolia WTS Services USA, Inc. - Fontana Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

G.A. Braun, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G.A. Braun, Inc averages 4.5 TCR (136% of the Laundry machinery and equipment (except household-type) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G.A. Braun, Inc TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=5.9 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2 · 2021=12.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where G.A. Braun, Inc falls in its industry

361 Laundry machinery and equipmen establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Laundry machinery and equipmen employers in New York.

G.A. Braun, Inc (190 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate G.A. Braun, Inc
G.A. Braun, Inc (190 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7

G.A. Braun, Inc has more employees than the Laundry machinery and equipment (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.6 8 0 0
2023 2.7 1.4 6 0 0
2021 12.5 2.1 6 12 0
2020 2.0 1.3 3 0 0
2019 2.1 0.0 1 3 0
2017 5.9 1.1 6 5 0
2016 3.1 1.0 2 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333318 · NY · North Syracuse

361 Laundry machinery and equipment (except household-type) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 26 employers in North Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Veolia WTS Services USA, Inc. - Fontana Service Center 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broken Arrow, OK 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHWEST PUBLISHING & MAILING 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.W. Martin & Sons, Inc 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lackawanna 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIME CAP LABS MANUFACTURING 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE 115 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Syracuse 721 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACE LA 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR BEACON NORTH SERVICE CENTER-NY80 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR 19 Syracuse 118 FTE
NAT-TCR Snyder Roofing of Oregon 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR U of ID - The Eatery 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Farm & Home Supply Lincoln 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 2676 Leominster 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE McGrath Imports (DBA: McGrath Honda of St Charles) 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6004 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6023 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin'S Food Markets 6424 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.