Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) · Alabama

GA Foods_Birmingham

Birmingham, AL · ~24 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GA Foods_Birmingham runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) workplace, earning a grade D.

GA Foods_Birmingham: 4.6 TCR = 154% of Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GA Foods_Birmingham safety composite

GA Foods_Birmingham scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

GA Foods_Birmingham: 0.0 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.43× in 2023

GA Foods_Birmingham's TCR rose 6.6 from 0.0 in 2021 to 6.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Birmingham, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 154% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #46/77
  • PHOTO LOCKHEED AERO CAFE
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LOCKHEED AERO CAFE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

GA Foods_Birmingham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GA Foods_Birmingham averages 4.6 TCR (154% of the Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GA Foods_Birmingham TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=6.6 · BLS 3.0

Where GA Foods_Birmingham falls in its industry

6,952 Industrial caterers (i.e., pro establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 77 Industrial caterers (i.e., pro employers in Alabama.

GA Foods_Birmingham (24 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate GA Foods_Birmingham
GA Foods_Birmingham (24 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

GA Foods_Birmingham has fewer employees than the Industrial caterers (i.e., providing foo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.6 6.6 1 0 0
2022 7.3 3.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AL · Birmingham

6,952 Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 840 employers in Birmingham, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LOCKHEED AERO CAFE 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bon Secours St Marys Hospital of Richmond - FNS 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boeing 86-302 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3033 Aston Park 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Young's Plant Farm, Inc. (Farm 1) 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherokee Gin & Cotton Company 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snead Growout 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Energy Center 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR USD 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLASSIC FOODS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIRMINGHAM PACKERS 8,650 FTE
NAT-TCR Charlotte, Nc - 212 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ERP-ODFL 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Storrs, CT # 243 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NAPP Vineland - 008 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wheel Pros 1015 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Western Plus Las Vegas South Henderson 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Les Schwab Tire-Bozeman 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Les Schwab Tire Center-Elko 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.