General medical and surgical hospitals · Alabama

Gadsden Regional Medical Center

Gadsden, AL · ~1,285 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gadsden Regional Medical Center runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade D.

Gadsden Regional Medical Center: 13.7 TCR = 182% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gadsden Regional Medical Center safety composite

Gadsden Regional Medical Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.8

2016→2021

Gadsden Regional Medical Center injury rate improved

Gadsden Regional Medical Center's TCR fell 9.8 from 22.2 in 2016 to 12.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.2 · 2017=13.8 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=15.0 · 2021=12.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Gadsden, AL ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 13.7 · 182% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #63/65
  • PHOTO 2576-289
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 456 inj
  • SIZE ~1,285 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2576-289 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Gadsden Regional Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gadsden Regional Medical Center averages 13.7 TCR (182% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gadsden Regional Medical Center TCR series: 2016=22.2 · 2017=13.8 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=15 · 2021=12.3 · BLS 7.5

Where Gadsden Regional Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 65 General medical and surgical h employers in Alabama.

Gadsden Regional Medical Center (1,285 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gadsden Regional Medical Center
Gadsden Regional Medical Center (1,285 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Gadsden Regional Medical Center has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.3 9.3 69 52 0
2020 15.0 12.2 47 100 0
2019 7.2 3.0 84 1 0
2018 11.7 3.0 69 69 0
2017 13.8 3.9 61 78 0
2016 22.2 7.2 126 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · AL · Gadsden

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 82 employers in Gadsden, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2576-289 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Rose Domincan-Rose de Lima 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raulerson Hospital 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR UMMC West Bank North Building 13.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kamtek Inc. - 1595 Sterilite Drive 1,290 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0580 - Huntsville DC 1,312 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maples Industries 1,256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Gadsden Processing Plant 1,247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Gadsden Alabama 1,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Foods Gadsden Plant 850 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverview Regional Medical Center 763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gadsden Plant 489 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1862 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR National Alamo 45B2 45B4 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters - 01 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oliver House 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 381793-Columbus Oh P&Dc 1,285 FTE
NAT-SIZE MercyOne Dubuque 1,285 FTE
NAT-SIZE Power Solutions LLC 1,285 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Collins 1,285 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.