Skilled nursing facilities · Virginia

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center

Gainesville, VA · ~113 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center: 14.8 TCR = 228% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center safety composite

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center: 10.0 → 58.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 58.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2022

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center's TCR rose 47.9 from 10.0 in 2016 to 58.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Gainesville, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 228% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #310/343
  • PHOTO Wellspring Health Ce…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wellspring Health Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gainesville Health & Rehab Center averages 14.8 TCR (228% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center TCR series: 2016=10 · 2017=9 · 2018=10.6 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=33.1 · 2022=58 · BLS 6.5

Where Gainesville Health & Rehab Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #310 safest of 343 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Virginia.

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center (113 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gainesville Health & Rehab Center
Gainesville Health & Rehab Center (113 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Gainesville Health & Rehab Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 58.0 8.1 9 41 0
2020 33.1 9.9 13 17 0
2019 11.3 9.3 11 0 0
2018 10.6 8.5 10 0 0
2017 9.0 9.0 9 0 0
2016 10.0 8.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · VA · Gainesville

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 48 employers in Gainesville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wellspring Health Center 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vintage Faire Residential 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hannah Duston 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennebunk Center for Health & Rehabilitation, LLC 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt Clifton Fruit Company 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE RICH CASTLEWOOD 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE TMG Construction - Company Wide 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Utilities 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Manassas 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Lake Manassas 042 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1873 - Gainesville 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR Superior Paving Corp. 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Vintage Faire Residential 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0017-0016-04091 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambridge House of Maryvi 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 0000000306 Public Works-Solid Waste 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Purple Wine Company, LLC 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swire Coca-Cola of Ogden 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE CATCO 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaver Aerospace & Defense 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.