Satellite dish, household-type, installation · Illinois

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford

Pecatonica, IL · ~17 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford runs at 292% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Satellite dish, household-type, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford: 8.2 TCR = 292% of Satellite dish, household-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford safety composite

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford: 8.3 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 27.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.39× in 2024

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford's TCR rose 3.1 from 8.3 in 2018 to 11.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 27.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Pecatonica, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 292% of ind

  • DART 11.3 DART
  • RANK #44/51
  • PHOTO Louis P Cote Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Louis P Cote Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford averages 8.2 TCR (292% of the Satellite dish, household-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford TCR series: 2018=8.3 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=27.3 · 2024=11.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford falls in its industry

1,138 Satellite dish, household-type establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 51 Satellite dish, household-type employers in Illinois.

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford (17 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford
Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford (17 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Rockford has fewer employees than the Satellite dish, household-type, installa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.3 11.3 1 0 0
2023 27.3 27.3 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.3 10.3 1 1 0
2018 8.3 4.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · IL · Pecatonica

1,138 Satellite dish, household-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 5 employers in Pecatonica, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Louis P Cote Inc 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Irwindale, CA 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mackenzie Group Inc 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overhead Door Company of Lancaster, Pa (Rowens Enterprises) 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beck's Neoga 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plymouth 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest Regional Water Reclamation Facility - NWRWRF - Village of Fox Lake 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Airoom Architect Holdings, LLC 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Valley Fooods 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anpec Industries, Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pecatonica Fire 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kirby Cable Service, Inc. 19 FTE
NAT-TCR Bitter & Twisted 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR New Vision Coop-Brewster Grain/Agronomy 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at San Jose Job Corps 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Building Maintenace - Headquarters (CHE P3 +CHS 5th Floor) 8.2 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.