Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Arkansas

Galley Support Innovations

Sherwood, AR · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Galley Support Innovations runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Galley Support Innovations: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Galley Support Innovations safety composite

Galley Support Innovations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−96.2

2018→2019

Galley Support Innovations injury rate improved

Galley Support Innovations's TCR fell 96.2 from 96.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 96.2 TCR.

2018=96.2 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Sherwood, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/7
  • PHOTO Goodrich Corporation…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Galley Support Innovations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Galley Support Innovations averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Galley Support Innovations TCR series: 2018=96.2 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Galley Support Innovations falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 7 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Arkansas.

Galley Support Innovations (38 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Galley Support Innovations
Galley Support Innovations (38 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Galley Support Innovations has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 96.2 96.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · AR · Sherwood

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 23 employers in Sherwood, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGDS-R955 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace Inc (WinstonSalem NC Fairchild 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions LLC (Sterling VA) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thompson Construction Group Inc Nucor JMS 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alliance Utilities Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.-BLY02 Hickman AR 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Industrial Services - El Dorado 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7 422 FTE
CITY-NEAR 03010001-030109 ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER NORTH 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-03010001-030109 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nizhoni Health Systems LLC - Framingham 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Co 850 Maines Food & Party Warehouse 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pearl Valley Rehab of Perry 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE CP Technologies Company 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.