Needles, hypodermic and suture, manufacturing · Texas

Galt Medical Corporation

Garland, TX · ~150 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Galt Medical Corporation runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Needles, hypodermic and suture, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Galt Medical Corporation: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Needles, hypodermic and suture, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Galt Medical Corporation safety composite

Galt Medical Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2023

Galt Medical Corporation injury rate improved

Galt Medical Corporation's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.5 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Garland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/42
  • PHOTO KARL STORZ Endoscopy…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. (Auburn) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Galt Medical Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Galt Medical Corporation averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Needles, hypodermic and suture, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Galt Medical Corporation TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Galt Medical Corporation falls in its industry

741 Needles, hypodermic and suture establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 42 Needles, hypodermic and suture employers in Texas.

Galt Medical Corporation (150 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Galt Medical Corporation
Galt Medical Corporation (150 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Galt Medical Corporation has fewer employees than the Needles, hypodermic and suture, manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 2.1 1.4 3 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 5 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2017 3.1 0.6 5 0 0
2016 2.5 2.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · TX · Garland

741 Needles, hypodermic and suture, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 316 employers in Garland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc. (Auburn) 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greatbatch Medical 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Collagen Matrix 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cordis- Santa Clara 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coldwater Dairy 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Home Builders Mansfield 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vulcan Materials Company - DMG Paving & Grading 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ramco Erectors Inc 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DDA2 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz Comany Garland 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osburn Contractors 933 FTE
NAT-TCR C&B-Delta Door Memphis TN 650 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2163 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #0731 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Maumee Pattern Company 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE EGC Construction Corp 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne Perry, Inc. 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100529 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100726 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.