Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Florida

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE)

Ft. Lauderdale, FL · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE): 2.1 TCR = 46% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) safety composite

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2019→2020

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) injury rate improved

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE)'s TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Ft. Lauderdale, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #64/137
  • PHOTO GLST1
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GLST1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) averages 2.1 TCR (46% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) TCR series: 2019=4.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 137 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Florida.

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) (23 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE)
Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) (23 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Gama Aviation Engineering (FXE) has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Ft. Lauderdale

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 111 employers in Ft. Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GLST1 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cherokee Nation Aerospace and Defense-Annville 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 989 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-EJ-20730195-MX 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GOPHER RIDGE GROVE 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE DESOTO GROVE 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oasis 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1247- HA- Live Oak, FL 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Nursing Network 2,937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross North Ridge Medical 2,937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Health Ministries 2,937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital, INC 2,607 FTE
NAT-TCR Carroll White REMC - Monticello 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 42 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CL&D Graphics Rock Hill 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Snap-on Tools, Elkmont Manufacturing 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rivard Companies 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calhoun, GA 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Restaurant Supply Co., Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 120 Akona 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.