Skilled nursing facilities · Texas

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Ganado, TX · ~67 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 2.2 TCR = 34% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2021

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 6.8 from 6.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Ganado, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #215/1034
  • PHOTO Camelot Leisure Living
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Camelot Leisure Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 2.2 TCR (34% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #215 safest of 1034 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Texas.

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (67 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (67 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Ganado Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 0 1 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2016 6.8 5.1 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Ganado

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5 employers in Ganado, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Camelot Leisure Living 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvest Manor 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Father Flanagan's North Florida 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pine Valley Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Complex 2 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Post Recycling 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE PT ARTH SABINE 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tolar - Northern District 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 231 TA Ganado 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7202 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store #5002 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7202 - 1-MAIN 19 FTE
NAT-TCR S08953 - Moreno Valley Transfer and MRF 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation (272-MARK) 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ulrich Planfiling Equipment Corp. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn High Point 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6500 W. 51st St. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamond Plastics Corp - Macon 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Service Transport 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Metalcrafters, Inc. 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.