Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC

Garden Grove, CA · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC: 13.4 TCR = 353% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC safety composite

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC: 0.0 → 26.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 26.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2024

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC's TCR rose 26.8 from 0.0 in 2023 to 26.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Garden Grove, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 353% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #470/635
  • PHOTO Cplace MC Botetourt,…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cplace MC Botetourt, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC averages 13.4 TCR (353% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=26.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #470 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC (40 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC
Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC (40 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Garden Grove MC Care Properties, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 26.8 5.4 9 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Garden Grove

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 145 employers in Garden Grove, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cplace MC Botetourt, LLC 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63030 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roswell, Elmcroft of 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atria Norwood 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stackhouse Brothers 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE PISTACHIO HARVESTING, INC. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watsonville/San Juan Bautista 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gomez Growers 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southland Industries 6,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR City Hall 677 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Wolf Lodge 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR King Janitorial Equipment Services 645 FTE
NAT-TCR Cplace MC Botetourt, LLC 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Adventure Supermarket, LLC Ea19 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Complete Care at Marcella 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kamco Supply - Albany, NY 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Porta-Dock, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHI 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas 10537 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Temple 10521 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.