Skilled nursing facilities · Louisiana

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation

Shreveport, LA · ~164 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation: 1.8 TCR = 28% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation safety composite

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation: 2.3 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.55× in 2024

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation's TCR rose 0.6 from 2.3 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Shreveport, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 28% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #61/314
  • PHOTO Arroyo Grande Care C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arroyo Grande Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation averages 1.8 TCR (28% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.3 · 2021=2 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 314 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Louisiana.

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation (164 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation
Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation (164 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Garden Park Nursing & Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 3 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2018 1.6 1.0 2 1 0
2017 1.3 1.0 4 0 0
2016 2.3 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · LA · Shreveport

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 403 employers in Shreveport, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arroyo Grande Care Center 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baldwin Gardens Nursing Center Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosewood Health & Rehabilitation Center 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Savannah Court of Milledgeville 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 216574-NOR-CENTRAL CARRIER STA 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4109 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Process Services LLC 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Bayou Companies 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Medical Center 3,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNIVERSITY HEALTH SHEREVPORT, LLC d/b/a OCHSNER LSU HEALTH SHREVEPORT 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Shreveport 2,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 1,567 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Graceland University 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Utilities Unlimited LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadway Electric Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ontario 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gilman Cheese 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springtree Rehabilitation and Health Care Center 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE 975 Lutter Drive 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Aluminum LLC 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.