Skilled nursing facilities · Missouri

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield

Chesterfield, MO · ~78 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield: 1.0 TCR = 15% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield safety composite

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2019

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield injury rate improved

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Chesterfield, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/457
  • PHOTO golden state colonia…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: golden state colonial healthcare (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garden View Care Center of Chesterield averages 1.0 TCR (15% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Garden View Care Center of Chesterield falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 457 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Missouri.

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield (78 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Garden View Care Center of Chesterield
Garden View Care Center of Chesterield (78 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Garden View Care Center of Chesterield has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MO · Chesterfield

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 126 employers in Chesterfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR golden state colonial healthcare 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lodge of the Wabash 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Downtown Health and Rehab 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterton at Cowhorn Creek 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pleasant Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH TROOST_1382300 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mr. Dell's Foods, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christian Extended Care and Rehabilitaion 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesterfield, MO 5,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital 3,689 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM MINISTRY OFFICE 1,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR CenturyLink 705 FTE
NAT-TCR University of Arizona 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR International Converter - Caldwell 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SAGE Teller Office, US 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Testing Laboratory, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE RBI Packing, LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Checking Co. - Montreal 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Samuels Group - Wisconsin 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pavarini North East Construction Company, LLC 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.