Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Gardens at Sumter

Sumter, SC · ~55 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gardens at Sumter runs at 279% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Gardens at Sumter: 10.6 TCR = 279% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gardens at Sumter safety composite

Gardens at Sumter scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gardens at Sumter: 1.8 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 20.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Gardens at Sumter's TCR rose 9.4 from 1.8 in 2018 to 11.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 20.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sumter, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 279% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #77/107
  • PHOTO Woodlands Senior Liv…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Woodlands Senior Living of Waterville LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Gardens at Sumter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gardens at Sumter averages 10.6 TCR (279% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gardens at Sumter TCR series: 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=20.4 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=20.4 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Gardens at Sumter falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Gardens at Sumter (55 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gardens at Sumter
Gardens at Sumter (55 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Gardens at Sumter has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 6.7 5 0 0
2023 8.1 4.0 4 0 0
2022 20.4 2.3 9 0 0
2021 10.4 2.6 4 0 0
2020 20.4 4.5 8 1 0
2019 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Sumter

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 130 employers in Sumter, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Woodlands Senior Living of Waterville LLC 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lorain, Elmcroft of 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Kent 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pinewood Terrace 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE JRD Growers 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Startex-Jackson-Wellford-Duncan Water District 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE JMCOPEINC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Axiom Foundations 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Construction Group 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Tuomey 1,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumter Utilities, Inc. 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Tire the Americas LLC - Sumter Plant 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR LNH- Concert Dr. 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Middleburg Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Marr B Olsen Inc 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR XGS - Chino 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Magnolia Creek 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transcontinental Packaging Albany 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAF 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ecp-Ground Ops 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.