Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing · Texas

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc

Houston, TX · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc safety composite

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc: 0.0 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.58× in 2021

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc's TCR rose 3.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #21/29
  • PHOTO Engineered Materials…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Engineered Materials : Gothenberg OES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc falls in its industry

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing d establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 29 Gasket, packing, and sealing d employers in Texas.

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc (36 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc
Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc (36 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Garlock Pipeline Technologies, Inc has fewer employees than the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · TX · Houston

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Engineered Materials : Gothenberg OES 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parker Livingston TN 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garlock - Palmyra, NY 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FRONTIER FEED YARD 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paco Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Waelder 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Plygem Windows 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eby's Sawmill 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Naomi Family Residence 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR McMillan Electric 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 101 Kindleberger 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadows Farms - Corporate 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSNA - 301 Mid America Blvd. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foam Fabricators, Inc 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.