Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing · New York

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC

Palmyra, NY · ~489 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC: 1.6 TCR = 50% of Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC safety composite

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2018→2024

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC injury rate improved

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.5 in 2018 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Palmyra, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #4/12
  • PHOTO Parker Gothenburg NE
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~489 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parker Gothenburg NE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC averages 1.6 TCR (50% of the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC TCR series: 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=2.2 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC falls in its industry

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing d establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 12 Gasket, packing, and sealing d employers in New York.

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (489 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (489 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC has more employees than the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.6 5 0 0
2023 1.0 0.6 5 0 0
2021 2.2 1.6 11 0 0
2020 1.8 1.0 9 0 0
2019 2.3 1.2 13 0 0
2018 1.5 0.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · NY · Palmyra

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 7 employers in Palmyra, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parker Gothenburg NE 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCI Manufacturing, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technetics Group Chicago, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR nolato jabar llc 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unity International Group 489 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huhtamaki- Fulton 489 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Chili-Paul 068 489 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAY PARK CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garlock - Palmyra, NY 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR JRLON, INC. 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPERIOR PLUS - 0102 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR A&P AUTO PARTS OF ROCHESTER INC 25 FTE
NAT-TCR R.S.A. Corp. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Energy Erectors Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 29 Cambridge, OH 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Federal Mogul 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Njtrn - Trenton 489 FTE
NAT-SIZE PLI Card Marketing Solutions 489 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ochsner Medical Complex - The Grove 489 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Orthopedic Hospital 489 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.