Low voltage electrical work · California

Garrahan Electric, Inc

Rancho Cordova, CA · ~21 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garrahan Electric, Inc runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade F.

Garrahan Electric, Inc: 6.4 TCR = 227% of Low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garrahan Electric, Inc safety composite

Garrahan Electric, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2018→2024

Garrahan Electric, Inc injury rate improved

Garrahan Electric, Inc's TCR fell 10.7 from 10.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.7 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=12.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Rancho Cordova, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 227% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #433/548
  • PHOTO RSM Lighting, LLC. d…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RSM Lighting, LLC. dba SALT Service Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Garrahan Electric, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garrahan Electric, Inc averages 6.4 TCR (227% of the Low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garrahan Electric, Inc TCR series: 2018=10.7 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=12.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Garrahan Electric, Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Low voltage electrical work establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #433 safest of 548 Low voltage electrical work employers in California.

Garrahan Electric, Inc (21 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Garrahan Electric, Inc
Garrahan Electric, Inc (21 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Garrahan Electric, Inc has fewer employees than the Low voltage electrical work median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 12.4 12.4 2 0 0
2022 6.8 6.8 1 0 0
2021 6.4 6.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.2 4.1 2 0 0
2018 10.7 10.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Rancho Cordova

4,550 Low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 163 employers in Rancho Cordova, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RSM Lighting, LLC. dba SALT Service Co. 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creek Jackson 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pfister Energy 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR A/C Electrical Contractors 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 78 2,409 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 55 2,365 FTE
CITY-NEAR SK hynix NAND Product Solutions Corp., DBA Solidigm 1,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Technology 968 FTE
NAT-TCR Cub Foods Eden Prairie - 5514 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Utsal - Salina 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sccha - Charleston Center 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wiste - Stevens Point Hub 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Leavenworth Service Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gordon Evans Energy Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atchison Service Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Chrysler 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.