Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New Jersey

Gatelink USA inc

Cherry Hill, NJ · ~70 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gatelink USA inc runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Gatelink USA inc: 4.8 TCR = 74% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gatelink USA inc safety composite

Gatelink USA inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gatelink USA inc: 3.8 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2023

Gatelink USA inc's TCR rose 2.1 from 3.8 in 2022 to 5.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Cherry Hill, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.8 · 74% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #68/211
  • PHOTO PASCR - SCRANTON
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PASCR - SCRANTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Gatelink USA inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gatelink USA inc averages 4.8 TCR (74% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gatelink USA inc TCR series: 2022=3.8 · 2023=5.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Gatelink USA inc falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 211 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in New Jersey.

Gatelink USA inc (70 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Gatelink USA inc
Gatelink USA inc (70 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Gatelink USA inc has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.9 5.9 5 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NJ · Cherry Hill

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 145 employers in Cherry Hill, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PASCR - SCRANTON 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDEAS - EASTON 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - WIL1 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RICE LAKE (WIRIC) 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Noble Construction Group, LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rutherford - Rooney 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE TriStruX 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLINE_Rahway, NJ 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Protocall NJ, Inc. NJ HC 2,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riggs Distler & Company Inc 1,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson Hospital Cherry Hill 1,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson Health NJ Cherry Hill - Formerly Kennedy Health 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Curry Medical Center - Brookings 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vesta Corporation 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stalcop Metal Forming, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Subaru of Morgantown 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lamco Packing 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mi Cocina - 509 Main Street, Fort Worth 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Mercury Grill - 11909 Preston Rd #14 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 12618-Pueblo 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.