Fluid power hose assemblies manufacturing · South Carolina

Gates Corporation - Greenville

Greenville, SC · ~85 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gates Corporation - Greenville runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fluid power hose assemblies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Gates Corporation - Greenville: 0.8 TCR = 26% of Fluid power hose assemblies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gates Corporation - Greenville safety composite

Gates Corporation - Greenville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2018→2023

Gates Corporation - Greenville injury rate improved

Gates Corporation - Greenville's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332912 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Anchor Coupling Meno…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anchor Coupling Menominee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Gates Corporation - Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gates Corporation - Greenville averages 0.8 TCR (26% of the Fluid power hose assemblies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gates Corporation - Greenville TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gates Corporation - Greenville falls in its industry

182 Fluid power hose assemblies ma establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Fluid power hose assemblies ma employers in South Carolina.

Gates Corporation - Greenville (85 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Gates Corporation - Greenville
Gates Corporation - Greenville (85 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Gates Corporation - Greenville has fewer employees than the Fluid power hose assemblies manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.4 0.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332912 · SC · Greenville

182 Fluid power hose assemblies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anchor Coupling Menominee 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR IRVINE AERO CA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bucher Hydraulics - Elgin 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danfoss Power Solutions II, LLC 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pee Dee Electric 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trident Construction, LLC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charleston, SC HVAC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paragon Site Work Constructors 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - Los Angeles Branch 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SNL Distribution Services Corp-Baton Rouge 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jett's Mechanical, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sturgis 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Industries, LLC - St. Louis Branch 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saco/Biddeford - BMD 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recommunity Delaware LLC. 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-County Child & Family Development Council, Inc. (Head Start) 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.