Industrial testing laboratories or services · Michigan

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills

Rochester Hills, MI · ~99 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial testing laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade C.

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills: 0.6 TCR = 110% of Industrial testing laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills safety composite

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills held a steady TCR band

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Rochester Hills, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.6 · 110% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/31
  • PHOTO Energy Absorption Sy…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Energy Absorption Systems, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gates Corporation Rochester Hills averages 0.6 TCR (110% of the Industrial testing laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Gates Corporation Rochester Hills falls in its industry

232 Industrial testing laboratorie establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 31 Industrial testing laboratorie employers in Michigan.

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills (99 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gates Corporation Rochester Hills
Gates Corporation Rochester Hills (99 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Gates Corporation Rochester Hills has more employees than the Industrial testing laboratories or servi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · MI · Rochester Hills

232 Industrial testing laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Rochester Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Energy Absorption Systems, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LASAN - Environmental Monitoring Division 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carber Holdings, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dugway Proving Ground 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reichenbach Ceiling & Partition Co. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE JD Candler Roofing Company 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weather Shield Roofing Systems, Inc. 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Detroit 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR FANUC America Corporation - Rochester Hills 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford- Rochester Hills Data Center 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Hills Data Center 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR InfuSystem, Inc. - Headquarters 367 FTE
NAT-TCR Disney Studio Entertainment 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Belton - 905 Highway 247 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Systems Plant Services, Inc.-BRS Osceola, AR 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Mid America District : SVC-KSC Lenexa KS-USA 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TransPak- Orange County 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pettibone : Steelastic 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sales - Section 32 - Bloomington, MN 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.