Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Colorado

Gateway Overnite

Grand Junction, CO · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gateway Overnite runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade B.

Gateway Overnite: 2.5 TCR = 57% of Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gateway Overnite safety composite

Gateway Overnite scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2023→2024

Gateway Overnite injury rate improved

Gateway Overnite's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.0 in 2023 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Grand Junction, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 57% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #3/31
  • PHOTO Prismatic Logistics
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prismatic Logistics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Gateway Overnite in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gateway Overnite averages 2.5 TCR (57% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gateway Overnite TCR series: 2023=3 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Gateway Overnite falls in its industry

1,452 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 31 Local letter and parcel delive employers in Colorado.

Gateway Overnite (74 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Gateway Overnite
Gateway Overnite (74 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Gateway Overnite has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · CO · Grand Junction

1,452 Local letter and parcel delivery services (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prismatic Logistics 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PacTrack Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weee Inc. Houston, TX (Logistics) 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Outlaw Logistics LLC 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Natural Soda LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherokee Station-105 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pawnee Station-888 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corden Pharma Boulder 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Goldshield 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wfs Tampa 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MADRAS 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR EMCom Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Union county Health and Rehab 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Plaza 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Boston Solar Company LLC 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Manufacturing & Logistics LLC 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.