Water system storage tank and tower construction · California

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc.

Sacramento, CA · ~64 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Water system storage tank and tower construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Water system storage tank and tower construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. safety composite

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 2.0 in 2018 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #62/201
  • PHOTO Pact Two, LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pact Two, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Water system storage tank and tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=2.3 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Water system storage tank and establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 201 Water system storage tank and employers in California.

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. (64 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc.
Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. (64 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Gateway Pacific Contractors, Inc. has more employees than the Water system storage tank and tower cons median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.7 3.1 3 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Sacramento

1,614 Water system storage tank and tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pact Two, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caddick Utilities LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.J. Louis Construction, INC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Firethorn, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR R&R Bindery Service Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Paramount Roofing, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jack Hilliard Distributing Co, Inc - Houston 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mizkan America 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silverado Hermann Park - 469 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andover County Market 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benton Town 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.